THE "LAST ANCHOR" OF SERB PRESENCE
Serbian Orthodox Sites in Kosovo
Keston
News Service - February 2002
Posted 25 February 2002 on RELIGIOSCOPE
Since
the arrival of NATO forces in Kosovo in mid-June 1999, some
108 Serbian Orthodox churches in the province have been destroyed
or vandalised; the work, according to the Serbian Orthodox
Church, of Albanian extremists. At present, these churches
are under the protection of KFOR, the international Kosovo
Force, but there are worrying signs that Kosovo's Serbian
religious and cultural heritage is low on the international
list of priorities.
In
the latest edition of Crucified Kosovo, a book published
by the Raska and Prizren diocese documenting these developments,
it is alleged that the destruction of Orthodox sites is carried
out in eight distinct phases. These are: 1) shattering due
to NATO action between 23 March and 11 June 1999; 2) looting
after 13 June 1999; 3) desecration; 4) burning; 5) initial
blasting with explosives; 6) blasting of surviving parts;
7) removal of building materials; and 8) clearance of terrain.
Church
representatives believe that the attacks are part of a systematic
campaign to eradicate Serb Orthodox presence in the province,
rather than simply acts of blind revenge. In the Kosovar Albanians'
struggle for a separate state, according to Fr Sava Janjic
of the Decani Monastery, "the Serbian Orthodox Church
is the last anchor of Serbian presence here, so we are strategically
dangerous to them." In one of only two mixed Serb/Albanian
villages, Osojane (in Albanian Osojan), for example, the Church
of St Nicholas, built in 1986, was "dynamited in a
professional way" some time after the arrival of
NATO forces, according to Sister Mikhaela of Pec Patriarchate
Convent. Since the most important structural parts of the
building had been targeted, she explained, it is now unsafe
and parishioners are forbidden to enter the building: "It
will have to be torn down."
Damage
to civilian properties
Keston
has not been able to obtain any independent confirmation of
the progressive and systematic destruction of Orthodox churches
in particular, but on 24 October 2001 the programme coordinator
of the United Methodist Committee on Relief, Mary Mayall,
outlined a similar process occurring to abandoned Serbian
civilian properties, In preparation for the return of the
Serb population to the second of the two mixed Serb/ Albanian
villages, Ljestar (Leshtar), the Committee chose houses which
had sustained only minor damage for rebuilding. However ,
when they returned to the village a few weeks later whole
walls were missing from these houses. Local Albanians, Mary
Mayall said, put this new damage down to "deterioration".
The
misuse or destruction of religious sites is nothing new in
the territory of former Yugoslavia. Similar reports have come
from Bosnia and Macedonia, Orthodox and Islamic sites
have been targeted by extremists on both sides. Nevertheless,
in Kosovo, the majority of pre-sixteenth-century monuments
are Orthodox, and it is these priceless religious and cultural
sites which are under threat.
Priceless
heritage under threat
The
Serbian Orthodox Church reports that 33 pre-sixteenth-century
churches were seriously damaged or destroyed by Albanian extremists
after the arrival of NATO troops in June 1999. Some 70 remain
intact. According to Mirjana Menkovic of the Mnemosyne Centre
for the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Kosovo and Metohia,
the five most important such sites are the thirteenth-century
Pec Patriarchate, the fourteenth-century Decani Monastery,
Gracanica Monastery, the Church of the Mother of God in Ljeviska,
Prizren, and the village of Velika Hoca, where four of the
13 churches date from the fourteenth century. She believes
they are undoubtedly on a par with Studenica Monastery in
Serbia, which was included on the list of UNESCO World Heritage
Sites in 1988. None of those cited by Menkovic, however, is
currently on UNESCO's list, and a May 2001 report aiming "to
define schedules for UNESCO interventions, for protection
and restoration of the cultural heritage" of the
province includes Orthodox sites in just two of its ten proposed
restoration/ rehabilitation projects. Menkovic described this
report to Keston as "shameless".
Incomplete
report
In
the report, its author, architectural adviser Carlo Blasi,
informed the UNESCO representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Colin Kaiser, that he had visited 'all main sites and monuments'
in Kosovo (some 40 are on his list), among them just six Orthodox
sites - the five cited by Menkovic and the "nice" eighteenth-century Church of St George in Prizren. The two
restoration/rehabilitation projects involving Orthodox sites
proposed the allocation of 500,000 deutschmarks (225,000 us
dollars or 160,000 UK pounds) to Decani Monastery and a total
of 150,000 deutschmarks (68,000 US dollars or 48,000 UK pounds)
to four unspecified churches in the village of Velika Hoca.
By contrast, four of the nine mosques visited by Blasi (ranging
from the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries) are proposed allocation
of individual restoration projects. Gracanica, Pec Patriarchate
and the Church of the Mother of God in Ljeviska are absent
from the project list, as are dozens of other early medieval
Orthodox sites.
Although
supposedly a scientific document, Blasi's report appears inconsistent.
It argues that 'places and monuments to which UNESCO intervention
now seems inappropriate were not included, such as buildings
completely destroyed and ones already under restoration'.
However, Blasi proposes the allocation of 500 000 deutschmarks
for the restoration of Decani's mosque, which a 2000 publication
produced by Kosovo's Islamic community, Serbian Barbarities
Against Islamic Monuments in Kosova, claims "was
burnt completely in 1998". Accompanying photographs
confirm that burnt and ruined walls are all that is left of
the main building.
While
the report argues that restoration of the Decani mosque is
important "because of the monument's historical importance
and religious reasons", no explanation is given for
the non-inclusion of other sites of historical and religious
importance, many of which are more ancient and/ or in a condition
not excluded by the report as ineligible for funding. Andreas
Szolgyemi, adviser to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE) on religious issues in Kosovo, said that
he had contacted UNESCO about protection of religious sites
in the spring of 2000, but "they were very, very uninterested".
On
the other hand, on 22 November Horst Goedicke, the chairman
of UNESCO's Intersectoral Working Group on south-east Europe,
described the protection and restoration of the Orthodox churches
in Kosovo as a "burning issue". A UNESCO
fact-finding mission would visit Kosovo within the next three
months. Regarding the possibility of protection of such sites,
Goedicke explained that UNESCO itself does not propose their
inclusion on the organisation's World Heritage List: "The
initiative to put sites on the World Heritage List must emanate
from the national government on whose territory the site is
located." It was the responsibility of the Yugoslav
government, he said, but UNESCO had to date not received any
such request from them.
Orthodox
sites under guard
In
the meantime, the Orthodox sites are still protected by KFOR.
According to Bob Charmbury, United Nations Mission in Kosovo
(UNMIK) deputy head of Pec regional administration, all Orthodox
churches "except lose already destroyed" were under individual KFOR guard, including those not in use
if located in an Albanian area. If they were in a Serb enclave,
he added, they would not be guarded separately. On 25 October
a KFOR spokesman, British Ministry of Defence employee Tim
Zillessen, told Keston that KFOR is currently providing protection
for 140 religious sites 24 hours a day.
''Under
siege"
In
the village of Gracanica (Ulpiana) - which is a Serb enclave
- Keston indeed observed only a single Swedish KFOR officer
outside the gates of Gracanica Monastery, while the roads
into the village are controlled by substantial military checkpoints,
Both Pec Patriarchate Convent and Decani Monastery have individual
checkpoints at the beginning of the track leading to their
entrances, which, in Decani's case, is guarded by some ten
Italian tanks. The ruins of the Church of the Holy Trinity
by the Pec-Pristina road, by contrast, are entirely deserted.
While
Keston encountered high praise among church representatives
for the Italian KFOR - who, according to Fr Sava, are providing "not just physical security bu t also assistance everywhere
where it is missing" - Mirjana Menkovic of the Mnemosyne
Centre pointed out that destruction was continuing because
the international authorities administering Kosovo had given "no signal to the Albanian community that it is unacceptable." As to arresting or prosecuting those responsible for the destruction,
Bob Charmbury accepts that this is at best unlikely: "You
wouldn't find them – impossible".
For
the present, Serbian Orthodox religious sites and communities
such as the Decani monastery are existing under siege. Fr
Sava joked:
"Decani
monastery is our island. The KFOR checkpoint at the gate is
our port, from which we take our ferry - an armoured
car - across a sea containing dangerous piranhas."
Geraldine
Fagan and Branko Bjelejac
Source:
Keston
Institute <http://www.keston.org>
This article
was first published in Frontier, N° 1/2002, pp. 6-8.
Frontier is published by Keston Institute, a charity
monitoring religious freedom and researching religious communities
in postcommunist and communist countries. A minimum donation
of £12 secures six issues of Frontier.
Address:
Keston Institute, 38 St Aldates, Oxford, OX1 1BN, United Kingdom.
[TOP]